United States vs. Sokolow

This case was about a guy Andrew Sokolow who was searches and investigated at the great of Hawaii airport because of his appearance and his activity. He paid for twain air lane roundtrip tickets in hard cash from a 20 dollar summit roll, he was article of clothing a obtuse jumpsuit and coin handcuffs, he traveled under a different spend a penny from that on his root word phone number and he neer checked any(prenominal) of his 4 bags. The person that sold him the tickets account him to the DEA affirming that he researched neuronal and suspicious and on his musical mode stern to Honolulu, Sokolow was block off and searched.         My opinion for this case is split in two, even though I am leaning more(prenominal) towards the opinion of the apostrophize. Sokolows appearance and behavior would look a little suspicious. First of tout ensemble he looked nervous, he acted nervous and the fact that he paid 2100 dollars in cash which is non very common and did non check his bags does attend a little suspicious. I agree with the opinion of the court that firing on a 20 hour feather to Miami for a short term of 48 hours and then flood tide back doesnt seem mighty. Even though I take over to consider that many people go on a far business trip for a day or two and they come back, still they breakt look doubtful. Sokolow was non a very smart man. If you have a go at it you ar involve in illegal activities and you are about to impart cocaine through the airport dont be so obvious and stupid. He paid in cash, he put on a jumpsuit and funds chains and when he came back to the airport he wore the like garments and was easily recognized. The DEA is responsible and they should check anything that seems mistrustful. I dont think that the DEA violated his privacy by letting the espouse sniff his bags because sniff of checked luggage is not a search. A sniff is allowed in a public airport. after a trained na rcotics dog positive alert to baggage for na! rcotics, officers have probable cause to seize the baggage and be compact search rationalise. The only mistake that the investigators did is that they did not stop him inside the airport notwithstanding outside on the sidewalk. That could be considered as invading of privacy.         In the other hand I do believe that everyone has the right to wear anything they want. Just because Sokolow was wearing a black jumpsuit and was paying in cash does not mean he was a drug corpus or he was smuggling drugs. May be that was his plectron of dress up and he was very rich and had that oftentimes money in cash on him. Even though I serene think it doesnt look right, you never know what mental of stile one has. The thing that gave him up however the most, wan not the way he was dressed but the way e was acting. He was nervous, he was constantly tone around and those are the signs of suspicion on the airports. If you are carrying something that you should not have been carrying on the airport, you have to be calm and relaxed and kind in posture of worried and nervous.         In conclusion I can say that appearance doesnt always blow over to suspicion, however in that respect are many factors knotty and putting all those factors in concert the DEA had every right to sniff Sokolows luggage and get a warrant to search it. If you want to get a full essay, put up it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay